<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Income stocks on sale!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timplaehn.com/2007/12/03/income-stocks-on-sale/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timplaehn.com/2007/12/03/income-stocks-on-sale/</link>
	<description>Earning Money thru Freelance, Trading, Investing and Building Online Businesses</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://timplaehn.com/2007/12/03/income-stocks-on-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timplaehn.com/2007/12/03/income-stocks-on-sale/#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Heck, I might have misread a little, but the author gave the indication he thought the dividend would be maintained, or at least a metric. Here is the line:

Maintain distribution, at least until 2011.

I personally do not have a problem if there is fluctuation in the dividend, I think production and cash flow will support the continued payout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, I might have misread a little, but the author gave the indication he thought the dividend would be maintained, or at least a metric. Here is the line:</p>
<p>Maintain distribution, at least until 2011.</p>
<p>I personally do not have a problem if there is fluctuation in the dividend, I think production and cash flow will support the continued payout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J R</title>
		<link>http://timplaehn.com/2007/12/03/income-stocks-on-sale/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>J R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timplaehn.com/2007/12/03/income-stocks-on-sale/#comment-765</guid>
		<description>I just read your article &quot;Income Stocks on Sale, Dividends Secure&quot;  It says that PWEs dividend is secure.  When I went to the article you linked as a reference, that article suggested the opposite.  What is your reasoning for believing that PWE can keep up their dividend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read your article &#8220;Income Stocks on Sale, Dividends Secure&#8221;  It says that PWEs dividend is secure.  When I went to the article you linked as a reference, that article suggested the opposite.  What is your reasoning for believing that PWE can keep up their dividend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

